Boris Johnson, Sir Keir Starmer and Jimmy Savile: how the row hit Westminster

The Prime Minister’s remarks in Parliament last week about the Labour leader caused a storm even among Mr Johnson’s own backbenchers and personal advisers.

Here are the key points on the issue:

– Who was Jimmy Savile?

Savile, who died in 2011, was one of the country’s most popular television personalities with a reputation for charity fundraising which helped cement his status as a national treasure.

But his public image masked a history of sexual abuse stretching across six decades, with an official investigation in 2013 identifying more than 214 offences including 34 rapes.

– How does Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer fit into the picture?

He was director of public prosecutions (DPP) from 2008 to 2013, leading the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).

A report published in 2013 found a chance to convict Savile for sex offences against three victims when he was alive was missed because police and prosecutors did not take the claims seriously enough.

The report by Alison Levitt QC, legal adviser to the DPP, found that “had the police and prosecutors taken a different approach” cases could have been possible in relation to three victims in 2009.

– What was Sir Keir’s role?

He played no role in the decision not to prosecute Savile, but as head of the CPS he apologised on behalf of the organisation.

“I would like to take the opportunity to apologise for the shortcomings in the part played by the CPS in these cases. If this report and my apology are to serve their full purpose, then this must be seen as a watershed moment,” he said.

– Why has the row surfaced again?

The Prime Minister raised the issue in the Commons as he fought to save his premiership during exchanges about the investigation into parties in No 10 during the coronavirus lockdowns.

Mr Johnson said the Labour leader was “a former director of public prosecutions — although he spent most of his time prosecuting journalists and failing to prosecute Jimmy Savile, as far as I can make out”.

The attack sparked a backlash from some Tory MPs, angry that Mr Johnson had levelled the kind of accusation at Sir Keir which is popular among conspiracy theorists online.

– What did Mr Johnson do next?

Under pressure from his own allies to back down, Mr Johnson said: “Let’s be absolutely clear, I’m talking not about the Leader of the Opposition’s personal record when he was DPP and I totally understand that he had nothing to do personally with those decisions.

“I was making a point about his responsibility for the organisation as a whole.”

Despite his clarification – which appears to be at odds with the words he actually used in the Commons – the Prime Minister has not withdrawn the remark in the House.

Mr Johnson’s attempt to backtrack was not enough for his close aide Munira Mirza, who quit No 10 over his refusal to apologise for the “scurrilous” attack on Sir Keir.

Chancellor Rishi Sunak, viewed as a potential successor to Mr Johnson, said he would not have made the comment.

– So the row hasn’t gone away?

No. If anything, it has deepened after a mob targeted Sir Keir near Parliament on Monday, shouting “traitor” and accusing him of “protecting paedophiles”.

Former Cabinet minister Julian Smith was among Tory MPs publicly calling for Mr Johnson to withdraw the Savile remark.

“It is really important for our democracy and for (Sir Keir’s) security that the false Savile slurs made against him are withdrawn in full,” Mr Smith said.

Labour’s Kim Leadbeater, whose sister Jo Cox was murdered while she was a serving MP in Batley, said: “Words have consequences, leaders have a duty to behave responsibly, and politics is not a game.

“Our country deserves far better.”